Lenders Law

 -  From Policy Intent to Enforceable Conduct Standards On 11 February 2026, the Reserve Bank of India released the   Draft Non-Banking Financial Companies – Responsible Business Conduct (Amendment) Directions, 2026  (“ Amendment Directions ”), effective from 1 July, 2026 . These amendments form part of the RBI’s broader effort to recalibrate conduct regulation for regulated entities, particularly in areas impacting customer protection, fairness and governance. Notably, the Amendment Directions flow directly from the policy intent articulated in  RBI’s Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies , released alongside the February 2026 Monetary Policy. The Amendment Directions therefore represent a deliberate regulatory progression rather than an isolated compliance update. Why Responsible Business Conduct Matters? The regulatory emphasis on conduct is rooted in persistent customer-level issues observed across the NBFC sector. Common themes emerging f...

When an operational creditor issues a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 , the corporate debtor has 10 days to: Repay the amount due, or Bring to notice the existence of a dispute . Sometimes, the real issue arises when a reply is sent — but instead of being a genuine dispute, it is a tactic to stall or avoid insolvency proceedings, or instead of a full reply, the corporate debtor sends an “interim reply” within those 10 days — saying something like “ We are in the process of preparing a detailed response to the Demand Notice. Meanwhile, we request you to kindly treat this communication as our interim/ holding response” .  Now, the question which arises here is: does this obligate the creditor to wait further before filing an application under Section 9? The Legal Framework Statutory Timeline : The Code strictly prescribes 10 days from receipt of the Section 8 notice. There is no provision for extending this timeline merely bec...